This previous week inexperienced hydrogen for power producer and gas cell vendor Plug Energy introduced that it was susceptible to going out of enterprise. Unsurprisingly, its inventory value plummeted from a historic low to a barely decrease stage.
What’s that? Nicely, Wall Avenue and analysts have quick reminiscences. Previous to the Plug Energy analyst name on Friday November tenth it was 99.5% off its peak inventory market valuation, one thing that occurred in March of 2000 at slightly below $1,500. Now it’s off 97.7%. That’s 0.2% variance in inventory valuation, which is hardly information. Until it’s about hydrogen in 2023 then breathless angst ensues.
Ballard Energy, one other gas cell hydrogen for power favourite of lengthy standing, was ‘impacted’ by this information as properly. It went from 97.1% off its peak inventory market valuation to 97.5% off.
Gasoline Cell Vitality takes the prize. In September of 2000 it was at $6,928, and now it’s at $1.05. The Plug Energy information barely stirred it from about to be delisted territory, and it’s been round 99.98% of peak valuation for some time. The way it’s managed to remain listed regardless of clearly being a useless agency rolling will probably be a footnote in an obsessive e book written by a failed hydrogen enterprise historian.
And it’s not like that is notably new information for the previous month. All three shares have been trending downward for weeks. That Plug Energy is 55% off of what it was a month in the past, whereas Ballard and Gasoline Cell Vitality are merely 10% to twenty% off is a rounding error on a dehydrated gnat’s thorax in comparison with their historical past.
What might need occurred roughly a month in the past that has been weighing down these barely performing hydrogen for power shares? Clearly traders aren’t onboard with the hydrogen for power hype that’s nonetheless seen in loads of locations.
Oops. A lot for affordable inexperienced hydrogen. That is from BCG, which like McKinsey has a consumer portfolio that’s heavy on oil and gasoline firms and has because of this been a giant hydrogen for power booster for the previous few years.
As I famous concerning the consensus remark, the consensus was of lobbyists, non-STEM coverage makers, financiers and the like. The consensus of people who find themselves STEM and economics literate and who’ve run the numbers stays unchanged.
The worldwide hydrogen for power bubble continues to deflate, as individuals like Michael Liebreich, the hydrogen-savvy engineers who based the Hydrogen Science Coalition resembling Paul Martin and random analysts who truly run the numbers like me have been saying would occur for years.
BCG continues out of 1 facet of its mouth to say energy to power initiatives are superb, whereas on the identical day out of the opposite facet of its mouth present loads of information that makes it clear that’s simply not going to occur.
For instance, in a current white paper with Oxford International Tasks, the joint staff have been articulating how energy to x initiatives may de-risk with fairly wise planning methods that assumed energy to hydrogen for power made any sense, however the information within the paper confirmed one thing radically completely different.
Solely 0.2% by tonnage of hydrogen energy to x proposals, the overwhelming majority for hydrogen for power, had truly made it to producing hydrogen. That’s 99.8% that didn’t. However the white paper means that the information exhibits “that the inexperienced hydrogen market is exhibiting sturdy momentum”. Actually?
A fifth of 1 p.c of introduced initiatives, one in 500, truly in operation doesn’t appear to be sturdy momentum. It appears extra like one thing that folks would have a look at and begin asking questions on if it have been offered extra fastidiously. If it have been framed extra fastidiously.
Maybe it’s the uncooked numbers of initiatives? Nicely, the variety of introduced initiatives in operation, per the BCG white paper information, is 5.6%. That really appears extra credible. A couple of in twenty initiatives introduced reaching operation looks like an affordable ratio. Till you bear in mind the 0.2% of tonnage. Solely tiny initiatives are reaching operation. Biggies usually are not reaching ultimate funding choice and development.
However absolutely there’s excellent news on this morass of dangerous information about hydrogen for power? Certainly there are many patrons panting for inexperienced hydrogen? Nicely, not in response to Bloomberg New Vitality Finance aka BNEF (Liebreich’s former agency, now owned by one other Michael, this one from New York).
They observe solely larger offers, 149 of them per Martin Tengler, head of BNEF Hydrogen Analysis. Wait, what number of bulletins did BCG say existed of their white paper? Nearly 1,350? That’s an order of magnitude distinction. Is it as a result of the offers are large? No. The deal backside that BNEF tracks begins at 20 MW of power capability — a silly metric that needs to be ditched as a result of it pretends hydrogen is power — or 2,800 metric tons of hydrogen per 12 months.
That’s a really low ground. The worldwide marketplace for hydrogen is within the vary of 120 million tons per 12 months. 2,800 metric tons is 0.2% of that. Rounding error territory. We would want to see 430 offers of that measurement simply to decarbonize our present hydrogen local weather downside, which is similar magnitude as all of aviation globally. So the 149 offers are unlikely to be remotely near addressing simply our present downside with hydrogen, by no means thoughts extending it to an power supply.
In fact, there have been a number of different issues serving to the palms forcing the heads of hydrogen for power performs below water. For instance, yet one more hydrogen gas cell bus trial has failed miserably. All of them do and normally it solely take 3-4 years. This one was within the French township of Pau, a 70,000 citizen considerably rural urbanish place that didn’t trouble to elevate its head above its parochial environment in 2019 to have a look at international examples of hydrogen buses failing and battery electrical buses succeeding. As an alternative it took two-thirds of the price of shopping for the buses and hydrogen refueling amenities from the EU and the federal government of France, and hoped that they’d hold subsidizing the absurdly costly hydrogen. Their hopes have been dashed. And so, they ditched the trial, pretending that they’d been courageous Gallic pioneers when trials hold operating and failing globally (exterior of China no less than as a result of they only do the spreadsheet work with out bothering with clearly fiscally silly trials) as a result of transit varieties refuse to have a look at empirical proof that isn’t recorded inside their slender jurisdiction.
Good organizations simply run some properly validated numbers by spreadsheets. Maersk’s APM Terminals division which owns and operates about 8% of the ports on the planet was pressured by stakeholders to recalculate empirical actuality. The basics of physics and economics clearly favored battery electrical and but they have been required to run the numbers for hydrogen and undoubtedly clarify many, many instances why hydrogen automobiles have been dearer to purchase and dearer to function.
Equally, the German state of Baden-Würtemberg merely did fundamental enterprise instances testing underlying assumptions and dodged the bullet of losing time and cash on hydrogen for rail. Grid-tied rail hybridized with batteries for the costly bits was a 3rd the price of hydrogen. Simple peasy. However not for Decrease Saxony, one other German state. They didn’t trouble to do the fundamental information validation and math up entrance, so purchased a number of hydrogen gas cell passenger trains a few years in the past, and now have purchaser’s regret. Again to batteries for Decrease Saxony.
The info retains making it clear that traders and spreadsheet jockeys who run the numbers aren’t placing cash into hydrogen for power. So why does it hold getting a lot consideration? It’s nearly as if there’s an enormous business determined to power hydrogen for power down the world’s collective throat. Nah, couldn’t be.
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Need to promote? Need to recommend a visitor for our CleanTech Speak podcast? Contact us right here.
EV Obsession Day by day!
I do not like paywalls. You do not like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Right here at CleanTechnica, we applied a restricted paywall for some time, nevertheless it all the time felt improper — and it was all the time powerful to determine what we must always put behind there. In idea, your most unique and greatest content material goes behind a paywall. However then fewer individuals learn it!! So, we have determined to utterly nix paywalls right here at CleanTechnica. However…
Iontra: “Pondering Outdoors the Battery”
CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage right here.