Container transport is an enormous deal. It’s been an incredible success story in world commerce and pivotal to creating transport cheaper and cheaper. It’s not an excessive amount of to say that it’s been an enormous a part of bringing individuals all over the world out of poverty. However unsurprisingly, transferring these metallic bins round takes power.
The water facet of the equation is the really arduous downside, though it’s not almost as arduous as many make it out to be. Ships carrying 24,000 containers blazing throughout oceans at 24 knots use a whole lot of gas. However there are innumerable methods to cut back the power required and apparent replacements for sources of power.
You’ll observe I’m not saying ‘gas’, however power. That’s a crucial abstraction for repowering discussions as a result of in any other case you will get sidetracked into inanities like inexperienced hydrogen, artificial methanol, or ammonia. No, the query is one in every of power, and the place power is required, electrical energy guidelines. As such, in my projection of maritime transport via 2100, all inland and two-thirds of brief sea transport shall be battery-electric.
Solely transoceanic and really lengthy coastal routes will really require the power density of burnable fuels, and people shall be biodiesel created from our huge waste biomass streams which can be at the moment emitting a whole lot of excessive world warming potential methane. The answer for maritime transport (and transoceanic aviation) can be an answer for our waste biomass world warming downside. Oh, and longer haul ships will probably be hybrid for value effectivity and to keep away from noise and air air pollution in ports.
However what about these ports? There are over 800 large container ports all over the world. The pc or telephone you’re studying this on undoubtedly had uncooked supplies, parts, and completed merchandise touring via these ports. Wherever you’re sitting or standing, you most likely have dozens and even lots of of merchandise inside a number of meters of you that had been in containers in a few of these ports in some unspecified time in the future of their worth chain.
That’s simply the world we reside in. I like to recommend studying the nice guide The Field: How the Delivery Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economic system Larger to get a greater appreciation for this innovation.
These ports are an enormous deal, in different phrases. Fashionable and creating economies rely upon them, even when most of us, more often than not, give precisely zero thought to them except we’re watching against the law drama with port scenes, or a film just like the Cruise automobile Warfare of the Worlds which characteristic container cranes.
Again to the query of energy, there are three forms of autos outdoors of the particular ships in ports. The primary are the large cranes and overhead gantries that transfer containers on and off ships and port stacks. The second are the bottom autos that transfer the containers round and infrequently on and off semi vans and trains, whether or not brief distance flatbed vans or cell cranes. For comfort sake, I’ll embody the varied midges of individuals and upkeep gear within the second class, as in comparison with transferring the containers, they’re a rounding error. The third are port water autos like tugs and tenders.
The primary two classes are container dealing with gear (CHE), tethered and untethered. There are about 100,000 to 120,000 CHE transferring over 800 million containers value over US$8 trillion yearly. The third assist ships dock, port pilots get to and from ships, and get gas into ships. APM Terminals — the A.P.Moller-Maersk division that runs about 8% of the ports on the planet — simply launched a white paper, The Case For Electrified Container Dealing with, on what to do about container dealing with gear. It compares the overall value of possession.
My acquaintance Sahar Rashidbeigi, world head of decarbonization for APM Terminals, has been instrumental to it and instructed me it was in improvement again in Might. Now that it’s out, we’ll be reconnecting as we document a few episodes for my Redefining Power – Tech podcast the place we dig into it (subscribe to listen to Rashidbeigi and lots of different STEM and economics literate innovators and leaders go deep on decarbonization options). My acquaintance Toh Wee Khiang, Director @ Power Market Authority of Singapore, has been holding me updated on decarbonization of port water vessels in that very excessive quantity port city-state. Let’s undergo the classes one after the other.
Tethered Container Dealing with Gear
This class is a no brainer. Most of them already run off of electrical energy. They’re simple to plug in and run. And naturally the electrical energy is straightforward to decarbonize with renewables, and that’s occurring globally. There are nonetheless hydrogen for power proponents who suppose hydrogen shall be within the electrical energy worth stream, however that quantity is shrinking each month as increasingly more spreadsheet jockeys get entangled.
The present faint hope for hydrogen within the electrical energy worth stream may be very lengthy length seasonal storage, which shall be required on common each ten years within the UK archipelago and each 50 to 100 years on continents. Nonetheless, there’s nothing concerning the molecule that makes it the apparent proper alternative for that use case besides wanting to make use of hydrogen for power someplace, so it’s unlikely to be there both.
Regardless, renewable electrical energy via wires to ports to tethered container dealing with gear is such a no brainer that it doesn’t advantage a lot dialogue within the white paper.
Untethered Container Dealing with Gear
So let’s discuss this class of autos a bit. They largely drive round at decrease speeds on stage floor. Port working areas have pace limits that fluctuate from 30 to 50 kilometers per hour. Air resistance at freeway speeds isn’t a difficulty. Elevation adjustments aren’t a difficulty. This class is usually wagons and forklifts for containers.
However the containers can weigh as much as 40 metric tons and might be 16 meters lengthy. It’s a non-trivial mass and set of dimensions to select up with a forklift and drop on a wagon. And it’s a non-trivial mass to set in movement and brake to a cease.
Unsurprisingly, most of those autos run off of diesel. This class of kit has emissions within the vary of 10 to fifteen million metric tons of greenhouse gasoline emissions yearly, about as a lot because the nation of Slovenia for a way of scale. For one more sense of scale, when the Canadian province of Ontario shut down its coal technology fleet, that eradicated 37 million metric tons of greenhouse gasoline emissions. In different phrases, port floor autos should not essentially the most burning concern in addressing local weather change.
However that’s zero purpose to not tackle them. 15 million tons continues to be 15 million tons. At at this time’s social value of carbon, that’s nearly US$3 billion in future damages to the world and our financial system. At at this time’s EU emissions buying and selling scheme value, that’s about US$1.3 billion in emissions pricing. And as of 2026, the whole lot imported to the EU, the third largest financial system on the planet, shall be paying that value underneath their carbon border adjustment mechanism. Budgetary steerage from the EU has the carbon value at US$203 in 2030 and $287 in 2040, so if not prevented, that’s an extra $3-4.5 billion in additional prices.
And whereas I mission a slower development in container transport than the growth since 1960, there nonetheless shall be development as containers proceed to displace bulk transport, and the world’s financial system shifts to extra native processing of uncooked supplies which can be then shipped by containers.
Delivery to the EU, a serious importer from just about all over the place on the planet, goes to get dearer if ports don’t decarbonize. Delivery is a deeply aggressive, low-margin world, so ports that don’t decarbonize gained’t be favored as a lot as ones that do. The EU’s Pigouvian taxes will work, and different geographies will set up carbon border adjustment mechanisms too.
So the query turns into, what replaces the power in untethered container dealing with gear? This looks like a no brainer to me and to most individuals. The traits of excessive torque, low speeds, no air resistance and flat floor make utilizing batteries trivially simple in comparison with 1,000+ km journeys of heavy items autos at freeway speeds over mountain passes with headwinds.
However after all lots of people are nonetheless mentally invested in hydrogen for power, so lots of people compelled the APM Terminals’s staff to justify, once more, that hydrogen is just not match for objective for that use case both.

Chart of whole value of possession comparisons between present diesel and alternate options of battery electrical and hydrogen for port floor autos
It’s fairly easy to do the comparability. As all the time, it seems that gas cell autos value extra to purchase and price extra to function than battery-electric autos. As with all whole value of possession comparisons, even in case you are very beneficiant to the hydrogen power stream, it simply doesn’t make any sense.
So the white paper concludes what each research does, that battery-electric floor autos shall be used. Yet one more potential hydrogen for power use case dissolves, proving that the sport is all snakes and no ladders.
However the issue can be proven within the graphic above. At the least proper now, battery-electric floor autos are dearer to buy and take longer to cost. There are value inhibitors for twenty-four/7/365 container ports that make them arduous to swallow.
The paper’s focus, as soon as it’s slapped hydrogen upside its molecular head within the first few pages, is sensibly on that hole. The hole will shut by itself as battery-electric autos unfold, with all three types of expertise attaining whole value of possession parity by 2030, however there issues the trade can do to hurry that parity’s arrival.
The paper lists three large levers:
- A significant lower within the TCO of BE-CHE (of near ~10% on common) can come from expertise studying results, reducing capex.
- The introduction of expertise requirements for battery packs, administration programs and charging options, notably to decouple battery procurement from gear manufacturing, might carry down the TCO of BE- CHE by 7% on common.
- Re-thinking the best way terminals are operated can optimise for charging and cut back downtime.
That interprets into constructing and shopping for a whole lot of the identical battery-electric gear versus each port pretending it’s a particular flower and customized designing distinctive options will save some huge cash and time. And that’s a cultural downside within the port and maritime trade. All of them suppose that they’re constructing distinctive engineering options to distinctive issues and so sub-optimal selections are made. Remarkably, that’s even in an enormous trade that’s centered round extremely standardized, modular containers.
The paper ends with a set of calls-to-action for various stakeholders within the ports, the terminal operators, OEMs, port authorities, affiliated authorities entities, and transport line operators. They’re all bathroom normal and apparent issues, however very value calling out. I’ll discover them with Rashidbeigi in our dialogue, as there are nuances in there.
However for untethered container dealing with gear, the cell workhorses of recent ports, the reply is similar as for all different types of floor transportation: batteries. It’s time to finish that mindless debate and get on with it.
Port Water Autos
Whereas I’m unaware of any white paper that’s as crisp because the APM Terminal launch for port water autos, this can be a place that’s additionally an apparent one. Whereas the occasional hydrogen vessel is commissioned by varied individuals, electrical ferries, electrical tugs, and electrical tenders hold slipping into the water in droves.
Singapore is an efficient living proof on this. Its Maritime Decarbonization Blueprint has seven focus areas, and home harbor craft is one in every of them. What does it say?
“All harbour craft will function on low-carbon power options by 2030”
Word the language: low-carbon power resolution. They aren’t falling into the seductive lure of ‘low-carbon gas’ that so many distributors of fuels and hydrogen for power varieties deeply want they’d.
From my perspective, that signifies that the entire alternative water craft will find yourself being battery-electric and that makes an attempt to make hydrogen work on the water will fail as effectively.
However Singapore isn’t there but. There’s a lot within the blueprint about importing hydrogen and creating use instances for hydrogen and creating infrastructure for hydrogen. There’s additionally so much about importing renewable electrical energy from nations each close by — Malaysia is barely a kilometer away throughout the Johor Strait and Indonesia is 16 km away throughout the shallow Singapore Strait — and distant, with the Suncable effort that’s again on the desk to carry Australia’s sunshine to the Little Purple Dot by way of subsea HVDC cable.
As I’ve been saying to Toh for a number of years now, it’s going to be all electrical energy, on a regular basis with an ASEAN Supergrid creating and tying into China’s Asian Supergrid. The use instances for hydrogen gained’t pencil out, and the nation will decarbonize with electrons, identical to all over the place else.
However that’s a course of and there shall be one million tiny experiments, every of which can but once more recreate the overall value of possession course of and discover that hydrogen for power doesn’t make financial sense. Singapore being Singapore, these assessments will probably be executed earlier than they commit an excessive amount of cash to hydrogen as a gas, not like the case of Decrease Saxony with its hydrogen practice debacle and reversal.
Sooner or later, the entire floor and water gear in ports shall be grid-tied or battery-electric. The ships that berth in them will are available in and go away silently underneath battery energy and plug into megacharging buoys and swap depleted containers of batteries for charged ones. They’ll use electrons for onboard energy as a substitute of mills. The ports shall be a lot quieter, a lot much less polluted, a lot much less of a greenhouse gasoline emitter, and way more environment friendly. Everybody shall be higher off on the finish of this course of. Properly, apart from the individuals who invested closely in hydrogen for power.
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Wish to promote? Wish to recommend a visitor for our CleanTech Discuss podcast? Contact us right here.
EV Obsession Each day!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=videoseries
I do not like paywalls. You do not like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Right here at CleanTechnica, we carried out a restricted paywall for some time, but it surely all the time felt incorrect — and it was all the time robust to resolve what we should always put behind there. In principle, your most unique and greatest content material goes behind a paywall. However then fewer individuals learn it!! So, we have determined to fully nix paywalls right here at CleanTechnica. However…
Thanks!
Neighborhood Photo voltaic Advantages & Progress
CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage right here.